Search results

@ou812 I find the whole "toll allow" thing to be unnecessarily confusing. I've ended up beating my head against the wall until I just removed all entries in the toll allow fields on extensions. I suspect a serious study of documentation would grant more insight for me, but it really isn't...

@pbxgeek Are there coding reasons you are still using node.js version 18.x and npm version 10.8? Current node.js is version 24.x and npm is 12.x. Will upgrading those affect the operation of FS PBX coding of the current release? AI suggests that the old version of Vite 4 and...

If anyone needs a script for DDNS update of the firewall for multiple dynamic dns entries, I have one I created with the assistance of AI. I have loaded it on FS PBX on both Debian-12 and Debian-13 and it adjusts for the differences in the version of Debian. You set the script to run as a cron...

I use a combination of APIBAN and VOIPBL. I have had zero attempts to hack into the system since implementing them. The following is an excerpt from a NerdVittles.com article on how to install them. Credit to Ward Mundy at IncrediblePBX.com and Nerdvittles.com.. Be aware that this restricts...

It would be helpful if the screen allows you to hover over the number and it pop up a message that number changes require the number to be deleted. I'd never thought of making a change to a number but that might help eliminate confusion.

Yeah, I just tried it. If you change the phone number, it does not update the rules on the next screen or the inbound route. Don't know if that is a bug or just a procedural issue where you should delete the old and add the new. @pbxgeek will need to comment.

I've always deleted the phone number and the corresponding inbound route for it then added the new number. I've never tried to change one. So if you choose to do a change on one, you'd probably have to modify the inbound route for the number you are changing.

I rebooted the server to clear the issue. I think I failed to clear the cache and then ran it again and caused the double.

I've been running FS PBX 1.9.3 since before the announcement hit the forums. My extensions all show registered in Status > Registrations and in the Accounts > Extensions. I have not yet applied to day's updates.

Yeah. With a little AI help, I worked it out. It was just a dial plan addition. Capturing the attestation level is pretty straight forward. I didn't need to do any LUA work. Land lines still don't send attestation and I'm in an area where there are still mostly landlines. The spammers and...

It is unnecessary to create an outbound dial plan rule. You set the outbound caller-id number on the extension itself using the GUI. Have you read the documentation for FusionPBX that explains how you do these things? Here is the link to documentation. https://docs.fusionpbx.com/en/latest/...

The other option is to the Dial Plan > Destinations and click on the Export button. This will output a spreadsheet you can use to apply spreadsheet magic to create a list of your inbound numbers and what extension should be associated with them. Then you can import the spreadsheet back into...

The current version of FS PBX is now 1.9.1. You might want to upgrade. There are many new enhancements and a new version of FreeSwitch. See the post from pbxgeek.

@pbxgeek This is a fantastic upgrade! Also, the newer FreeSwitch will solve some known issues. Your new certificate handling is fantastic! As always, your amazing work and that of your team is tremendously appreciated!

Nope. When I reject or send a busy, my carrier sends a busy tone, which is not optimal. They keep calling back. But you're correct that it does not bill on the reject. Just on the voicemail. I like sending an early media recording with the SIT tone so auto-dialers (in theory) remove the number.

@pbxgeek Any ideas about this? Dial plan mods aren't too difficult but I'm not sure how to capture the P-Attestation-Indicator from the SIP Invite from my carrier. FS PBX is beginning to resemble less of FusionPBX so I don't know what is legit on your system for extracting SIP Invite data. The...

It would just be nice to have the flexibility to route to a number or an announcement. I have an early media recording (so I am not billed for the time) which tells the caller the number is not in service. The extension is actually a dial-plan addition with an assigned number but the number is...

I'd like to see a change on the block calls screen at the actions drop-down so that you could route the blocked call to an extension or any other type of destination or to a recording you specify. I'd like to send a blocked call to an early media recording and then drop the call.

I had the same problem. I tried to upgrade twice but no go. Finally, I did a git stash in the /var/www/fspbx directory and ran the upgrade again and it worked.

Is anyone parsing out the attestation headers so that if the P-Attestation-Indicator is blank or "c" types the call can be sent to another destination than the called number? I'm sick of the calls from Cinch-family of companies that so far are 100% spam. I'd like to know how to achieve this...