Fail Over

Status
Not open for further replies.

Matthew Main

Member
Jan 24, 2017
92
5
8
39
Hi Guys,

Had an interesting one a few days ago and trying to work out if having a cluster is really needed.

I had a friends server fall over due to disk full, I do not maintain it, he wont pay for it so i just fix it when it breaks, the database crashed, but the phones did not fail over, i can only guess that the phones could still see the soft switch and there for did not think they needed to move.

I can have a vm restored in a matter of min, so do i need a cluster?

Kr

Matt
 

DigitalDaz

Administrator
Staff member
Sep 29, 2016
3,044
565
113
What about when you have 100GB of recordings, how fast can you restore it then? ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: tag915

Kenny Riley

Active Member
Nov 1, 2017
243
39
28
36
If you use smart DNS and set your registration timers for your endpoints to 120 seconds -- phones will start to fail over within seconds, up to 2 minutes if the primary node becomes unreachable.

I highly doubt you will be able to restore a VM that quickly.. especially if you have a good amount of call recordings as Daz mentioned...so, it really just depends on how much downtime you can tolerate as to whether or not you need a cluster in place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tag915

markjcrane

Active Member
Staff member
Jul 22, 2018
448
162
43
49
It depends on how long a downtime is considered acceptable. The least downtime requires a cluster.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.