Search results

  1. M

    Step by step inbound multi-tenant

    A simple question: how can I specify into the Time Condition during a matching rule, to call an external number ?
  2. M

    Step by step inbound multi-tenant

    Great! I have removed a rule in outbound route with 3 digits that wrong matching 100 extension ! Thank you very much.
  3. M

    Step by step inbound multi-tenant

    freeswitch@vpsXXXXXX.ovh.net> sofia global siptrace on +OK Global siptrace on recv 1118 bytes from udp/[188.xxx.xxx.xxx]:5060 at 15:56:20.447849: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ INVITE...
  4. M

    Step by step inbound multi-tenant

    I have seen. I don't change anything and I'm using 3cx for both extensions (10 and 100). The only different thing is used domain. As you have seen, the only thing I captured of different on log is the international prefix on received callerid for good call and no international prefix on...
  5. M

    Step by step inbound multi-tenant

    Instead this is the CALL LOG of a GOOD call: +OK log level [7] 2018-02-13 10:44:51.368368 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1792 SIP auth challenge (REGISTER) on sofia profile 'internal' for [10@pbx.xxxxxxxxxxxxx.com] from ip 5.158.67.106 2018-02-13 10:45:56.668378 [NOTICE] switch_channel.c:1104 New...
  6. M

    Step by step inbound multi-tenant

    This is the log of FAILED call: [This app Best viewed at 160x60 or more..] +OK log level [7] 2018-02-13 10:35:26.068356 [WARNING] sofia_reg.c:1792 SIP auth challenge (REGISTER) on sofia profile 'internal' for [100@pbx.xxxxxxxxxxxxx.com] from ip 5.158.67.106 2018-02-13 10:35:26.528343 [WARNING]...
  7. M

    Step by step inbound multi-tenant

    I have configured both inbound DIDs but while in first case I receive call and I can see that: 2018-02-13 10:12:07.628343 [DEBUG] freeswitch_lua.cpp:365 DBH handle 0x7fefd40ca980 Connected. 2018-02-13 10:12:07.628343 [DEBUG] freeswitch_lua.cpp:382 DBH handle 0x7fefd40ca980 released. 2018-02-13...
  8. M

    Step by step inbound multi-tenant

    Another problem. I have different DID providers. One provider put the country prefix in front of number and I successfully receive call on 3cx connected to Fusion Other provider remove country prefix and sent number starting with 0 and I receive always CALL REJECTED it could be that the...
  9. M

    Multi, Multi Tenant

    Another thing is following. I'm asking that because I'm coming from Asterisk world and I need to convert my mind to configure Freeswitch as well. When I use registration string for a provider I user register => username:password@proxy.address:5060/DID_number DID_number match with inbound route...
  10. M

    Multi, Multi Tenant

    I have retried and in effect it doesn't work. Is it possible I created the gateway on the main default domain created automatically by the fusionpbx installation and it behave like a shared gateway ? More, is it possible to use ACL to permit or deny inbound registrations to the internal...
  11. M

    Step by step inbound multi-tenant

    I have added the provider IP into ACL with /32 prefix and it works
  12. M

    Multi, Multi Tenant

    Tonight I have successfully configured Inbound route but before I have changed ACL to permit the IP /32 of our provider. I have seen the ACL will be reloaded only from Linux CLI. If I will do it from SIP Status, it doesn't work. Then I created inbound route with correct DID looking on SIP...
  13. M

    Step by step inbound multi-tenant

    Hello to everyone, I'm really new to this forum, more newbie to freeswitch and fusionpbx. Since now, I have always used Asterisk, FreePBX, and all tolls you surely just know. I'm decided to move to fusionpbx to use multi-tenant feature to use a single machine to give separated PBX features to...
  14. M

    Multi, Multi Tenant

    Instead a simple multi-tenat myself managed Fusionpbx installation is it possible ? I ahve tried to install many time Fusionpbx wiating different months before redoing, in the hoping to following official documentation and obtain a working multi-tenant system without success. Someone, can point...