Search results

Is it possible to limit the types of destinations available in the 'Destination' dropdown in an IVR menu. By default if displays everything - Outbound destinations, Dialplans, Extensions, Fax servers, Recordings, Tones, SIP trunks etc. I'm trying to hide the Fax servers and SIP trunks as, in my...

In 'Dialplan Manager', look for 'recordings' (Number *732, Order 400). In there is an action to set the pin_number value.

814 does have more P-parameters than 812 (Additional P-parameters for port 3 and 4 on the 814), I don't think that'll make it reject the whole config file but it may, I never tried that.

Could be the template itself now. Look into the syslog on the device with it set to 'EXTRA DEBUG', that'll tell you if and what it doesn't like in the config file. OR if you're familiar with the GS config file structure and parameters, download it directly from your FusionPBX and give it a read...

That is fine. It will always ask for ALL those other files as well even though it already received the cfgMAC.xml or any one of those other config files. Its just how GS ATA are.

You shouldn't have to add anything in the config prefix or postfix, thats only for when you have multiple different versions of the config file differentiated with some prefix or postfix value. I just looked at the logs for one of my HT-814 and it looks for the config file as I mentioned above...

The sequence the GS HT series ATA's look for, for its config file is; cfgxxxxxxxxxxxx (Binary file) cfgxxxxxxxxxxxx.xml cfg.xml Here xxxxxxxxxxxx is the LAN MAC of the device in lowercase. I'd say match your template file in FusionPBX to be cfg{$mac}.xml

I can't be the only one experiencing this issue here. Would appreciate if someone would like to share what their experience is with a setup like this and if there's a fix or workaround to this that I'm missing.

Have you looked into the PIN numbers app?

I tried this on 5.2 and it works for me as expected. I don't have the EDIT (Pencil) button, instead I have a drop down to select a profile from. What release are you running?

Check here, under Advanced > Eavesdrop *33 <ext> Eavesdrop Listen to the call. Press 1 remote, 2 local, 3 full conversation, 0 mute

Hello all, Looking for some suggestions around this issue that I'm experiencing with calls to external PSTN numbers via Ring groups. So I have a user extension, Ext 1001, that is call forwarded to an external number 416xxxXX31. And this Ext 1001 is part of Ring Group 8001. Ring group has...

Thank you @markjcrane

@michelerizzo88 Usually carriers follow the below order of preference for caller ID (Atleast North_American carriers) 1/ P-Asserted ID header 2/ Remote-Party-ID header 3/ From header In your case. you are atleast sending the R-P-ID header correctly (0832139XXXX for name and number - I'm...

@mudasar321 Its always a good thing to share back what you found to be the solution to your issue, so that others who may experience the same issue can use your solution.

Isn't that the default behavior when a external number is dialed from an IVR, the original caller's caller ID name and number is used on the outbound call to external number. What version of FusionPBX are you running? How are you dialing the external number from the IVR? Can you share the...

BTW, fixing the above typo in destinations.php fixes the duplication issue, but looks like there's another issue with Actions column as well. I see changes were made to actions function as well in the same commit (6176ea2).

@whut I only signed my CLA to be a contributor for the project yesterday after I found this issue. Waiting for the signed CLA pull request to be merged first.

Well, looks like its just a typo in a recent commit (6176ea2) to destinations.php Line 244 foreach ($destinations as &$row) { should be foreach ($destinations as $row) {

Tried this on two fresh installs, FusionPBX master branch, just to rule out any config errors and same results. No new applications or mods installed after fresh install. Added first inbound destination, and saved it. (Using fake numbers for demo, and leaving the ACTION blank - same results)...